Sunday, November 30, 2008

Cebu's Iconic


 Lately I’ve been asking people around me to tell me a building that best represents Cebu City. I always get the same reply: Magellan’s Cross. Does this mean that our contemporary architects are not capable of building an iconic building? Or is it necessary to do so in the first place? 

Most buildings in the classical and medieval period can be considered iconic, especially those that were built like monuments. Heritage buildings are also iconic in the Philippines. People can easily associate a place when shown a picture of an old church or old structure. My concern, however, is the local contemporary architecture. 
What does it need for a building to be iconic anyway? First, as mentioned in my previous blog, the building has to be unique enough to catch the attention of media. Second, I think that the form should be simple enough to be drawn or described by anyone from memory. Third, the building should be situated in a place where it can easily be viewed in totality in at least two sides. Finally, the building should have a deep connection with the people in the locality. 
In Cebu, I am yet to find a building that meets all these criteria. Other than the Magellan’s Cross, the structures that would find its way to post cards are the Provincial Capitol and the Mactan Bridge. The Provincial Capitol, however, is not really contemporary and its neoclassical style is not so unique. The Mactan Bridge, on the other hand, is not a building in the first place. Because a second bridge was constructed, the Mactan Bridge started to lose its significance. 
The tallest building in the city is probably the Club Ultima. The building, however is complicated in form and is not viewable from good vantage points, especially because only one side faces the street. The Terraces in Ayala has been attracting a lot of people but a picture of this can easily be mistaken for the Greenbelt in Makati. Even the controversial Cebu International Convention Center, failed to meet the criteria of an iconic building because its form is not unique enough. 
For me, the best candidate for an iconic building in Cebu would have been the original design of the Megadome which won in the Design Competition. It enjoyed good media coverage, its form is unique yet simple enough to be retained in memory, it is also easily seen from many vantage points because of its site (it can even be seen from the Mactan Bridge), and most of all, everyone felt that it was a fitting design for Cebu. 
Unfortunately, it will never be realized for now the CICC stands on the site allotted for the Megadome. 
It is not easy to find a building that can be considered iconic. Cebu had its chance but lost it. For now, we will content ourselves with the Magellan’s Cross.




14 comments:

  1. umm... is magellan's cross even a building?
    sue me avid readers of mr. elizaga's blogs if i am being too agreeable... but hey, i agree. club ultima, isn't very "jaw-dropping" and cicc looks like SM with wings.

    the megadome has a potential, if only it was an existing matter occupying space and has mass, but it isn't. it shall stay a concept should the continuous ranting of politics and massess (who do not appreciate good architecture) go on like the drama-series we see in our local channels.

    anyway, we need a soul who will brave all the politics and masses to make that "iconic building" a reality... or maybe just a really rich dying old man who doesn't have any use for his money to invest on a dream such as that. so if we don't have any takers, i might as well go with the flow and stick with magellan's cross even if it really looks and feels like just a fancy guard house to me.

    ;0)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hehe... Not too imposing... too small to be iconic...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well... there's a floor and roof, and walls and doors/windows... yup, a shrine, a mausoleum, a martyrium, and the like are considered buildings... technically... hehe...

    ReplyDelete
  4. didn't know i have an avid reader... haha!... why sue?... everyone is free to express his/her opinion here....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Their designs are not really that unique... The top of waterfront hotel is echoed by the buildings near cebu plaza... hehe....

    ReplyDelete
  6. waterfront is like the house of the seven dwarves on top of sleeping beauty's castle. at least that's how my kids describe it. architecture critcis in the making... you can never train em too early...

    hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  7. they are icons mainly because it reflects the taste of architecture most cebuanos embrace.. there are only a few architects in cebu who are good with the international style. Cebu is too immature and is not ready for this uniqueness you desire

    ReplyDelete
  8. troy...you should have attended our chapter GMM last Friday since we had a very healthy discussion on a topic related to this =)

    ReplyDelete
  9. haha! no one can beat children when it comes to criticisms. they say it straight without reservations...

    ReplyDelete
  10. so unfortunate i was kidnapped that night.... so much regrets =(

    ReplyDelete
  11. unfortunately, to become an icon... acceptance from at least the national level is needed... local value is just one of the four requirements i mentioned...

    ReplyDelete
  12. in my opinion sir, there is no need to seek out or build a structure nga mu represent sa Cebu.. kay if naay mu attempt ana sir, mu fail rana sila nya mahulog ra ang building nga papansin.. because sir, kana nga identity, knahanglan mu grow ra naturaly.. murag dli jd mu work kung i enforce.. ehehe

    ReplyDelete